The key to successful leadership today is influence, not authority. - Ken Blanchard
 Performance Culture Strategic Planning Workforce Planning Recruitment, Selection, Succession Planning Performance Management, Rewards & Recognition, Work Environment Career Development, Diversity Management, Knowledge Transfer, Leader Development Retention Metrics
Featured Pages

DIRECTORY OF RESULTS EXPECTATIONS

Following are examples of metrics-style results expectations drafted or modified specifically for inclusion in this Directory.

As state agencies gain experience using results-based performance management, this directory will be expanded. If you are using metrics-style measures, you are invited to share them with us. We may include them here in a slightly modified form.

The targets entered in the table are arbitrarily chosen and are shown here for illustrative purposes only. Targets should be set based on mutual understanding of the expected standards or on actual baseline data. As illustrated, targets should specify a range representing "meets expectations."

Supervisors and Managers

1. Financial

Measure

Target

Comment

% variance to budget

0-5%

Cost per licensure applicant

$115-140

Cost would need to be clearly defined to specify what is included in computing the figure (e.g., labor, supplies, overhead, etc.).

2. Customers

Measure

Target

Comment

Score on customer satisfaction survey

80-90

Requires clearly defining who work unit's or department's customers are, developing survey to measure how well their requirements are being satisfied and collecting sufficient data to produce a reliable result.

Crash rate on state roads within Division

1.50-1.75

An outcome measure that could be appropriate for DOT Division Engineers. Aligns to Department's goal of safe transportation network.

Ratio of North Carolina State-chartered banks to US banks pre-tax return on assets

1.00-1.10

An outcome measure that could be appropriate for senior managers at the Office of the Commissioner of Banks, which is responsible for promoting a strong marketplace for financial services in the state.

3. Processes

Measure

Target

Comment

% of license applications processed within 10 days with no rework required due to employee error

70-85%

Represents a roll-up of measures of performance of several employees the supervisor supervises. Note that this measure includes both a speed and a quality component.

% of transactions completed following the new process

25-40%

Appropriate when phasing in a new process on a disciplined time schedule, rather than making the change all at once. Over time, the target is moved higher.

% of transactions requiring manual processing following initial system conversion

10-15%

Appropriate when converting to a new process all at one time.

% of key positions filled within 30 days of position becoming vacant

25-35%

Need to clearly define when to start and stop counting the days.

4. People

Measure

Target

Comment

Average score of employees supervised on annual employee engagement survey

70-80

Should not be used for supervisors who have fewer than 5 direct reports. When used for managers, measure should include both direct and indirect reports.

Score on engagement checklist

70-80

For supervisors with fewer than 5 direct reports. Requires creation of checklist of items indicative of high engagement. Checklist to be completed by panel of judges familiar with supervisor's day-to-day work.

% of preventable turnovers among directly and indirectly supervised employees who are performing at Outstanding level

10-20%

Should be used only with managers with 5 or more employees in chain of com­mand who are rated at Out­standing level. Preventable = voluntary turnover not due to factors out of supervisor's control, such as resignations due to health, retirement, trailing spouse, etc., or that is considered positive, such as promotion, movement to a higher-level position in another state agency, etc.

Individual Contributors

Measure

Target

Comment

% of internal customers satisfied with service provided

80-90%

Based on scorable questionnaire send to service recipients periodically (e.g., annually). Question­naire must be carefully constructed and a process put in place to send it out and tally the results. Could sample recipients rather than send everyone a question­naire.

% of external customers satisfied with service provided

80-90%

Based on scorable question­naire sent to service recipients X days after service has been provided. Question­naire must be carefully constructed and a process put in place to send it out and tally the results. Could sample recipients rather than send everyone a question­naire.

% of applications processed within 10 days with no rework required due to employee error

70-85%

Note that this measure includes both a speed and a quality component.

Score on periodic evaluations of customer interactions

80-90

Involves supervisor unobtrus­ively listening in on employee's interactions with customers. Requires creating checklist defining factors that are critical to effective interaction and method for scoring.

Score on assessment of quarterly report

8-9

Based on scorable checklist of factors that define the standards for the report (e.g., on time, clearly written, no grammatical or spelling errors, based on accurate data, includes action recommenda­tion). Multiple judges should ideally be named.

% of trainees whose managers report they have changed their behavior or used the newly acquired skill or knowledge on the job

70-75%

Appropriate for trainers as a measure of training outcomes.

% of assigned projects completed on schedule, on budget, and consistent with expectations

70-80%

Appropriate for employees who carry out numerous projects during the year. Note that measure addresses timeliness, cost, and quality. Due dates and standards for each project will need to be defined and a scoring scheme devised.

% of travel and budget worksheets processed and submitted within 5 days of receipt

80-90%

% of vendor bills paid within 10 days prior to due date

80-90%

% of contested decisions that are successfully defended or upheld

80-90%

% of trainees who successfully complete comprehensive examination within the first 2 years

70-85%

Score on support provided to Secretary and Deputy Secretary

7-8

Based on scorable checklist of factors that define "support" (e.g., appointments accurately maintained with no conflicts, secretary and deputy secretary on time for meetings, etc.). Multiple judges should ideally be named.



Resources

Directory of Results Expectations pdf printer-friendly